we: A tower being struck by lightning and besieged by a dragon. (Vova | The Tower)
There's nothing to be gained by making oppression a pissing contest, but far too many people think that's the case. Instead of treating people individually, they stack suffering based on their demographics.

Last year, there was a situation we witnessed in which someone was told to shut up (not literally, but that was the impression I got) because they wanted to be consoled when someone who was more oppressed was complaining, even though the more oppressed person is a fucking arsehole who doesn't have much regard for others' feelings.

The complainer is the same person who told us that they "didn't want to be nice to their oppressor" when Yavari told them that everyone, regardless of their background, had potential to be a jerk.

Yavari never asked them to be nice to their oppressor, but they put words into his mouth. It's just a basic fucking fact that people can be jerks no matter their colour, gender or creed. Anything else is essentialist bullshit. Whatever genius said that "people of colour" are immune to being unpleasant needs to think again. Once you start making claims like this about groups of people, you stop seeing them as individuals. That's just a mirror image of what you see from "scientific" racists/xenophobes who think Mexicans or Romanians are stupid, lazy migrants, or Black people are stupid and jovial.

(Ironically, we ourselves would win, or come close to winning, Oppression Olympics, at least within the US context. But that's not how we move through the world.)

This is the kind of thing that exhausts me about social justice activism. Lefties should be better than that.
we: Text: 'between the idea and the reality' (Vova | Between the Idea and the Real)
I am not woke, and I'm not anti-woke either. What do I mean by that?

I don't subscribe to the idea that demographic characteristics, such as race, trump human uniqueness or our ability to connect with one another within or across cultures. I don't believe that there need to be segregated spaces for "people of colour" (an expression many of us hate, though we—though not I—use it for expediency). I support feminism, anti-racism and LGBTQ+ rights not because I want these things to be central to my identity; instead, it's because I want them to be less relevant.

"Cancelling" Tolstoy, Shakespeare and Molière will not lead us to liberation; instead, it will tear apart cultural narratives and leave us with a congeries of disconnected snippets in their place. Cultures, especially multi-ethnic cultures like Russia, Britain, China, America or France, share common histories as well as particular ones. We can tell the tales of Kievan Rus and Catherine the Great, as well as the histories of the Chechens and Buryats (and Pushkin straddles both sides of this debate, since he was biracial). We can talk of Lev Tolstoy, Thomas Paine, John Bunyan, Sojourner Truth, Cherríe Moraga and Sherman Alexie without sacrificing anything. To tell the whole story, we need to include the dominant and subaltern narratives. To omit both is to tell half a story—and make it impossible to share a common culture, whether within a nation-state or across humanity as a whole.

And why I can't read much anti-woke criticism, and what we should do instead )

Profile

we: Text: "Listen: there's a hell of a good universe next door. Let's go." (Default)
Plures House

September 2024

M T W T F S S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23 24 2526 272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 23 Apr 2025 13:32
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios